Best Blackjack Betting System

Thomason also compared his progression to both Donald Dahl’s and John Patrick’s progressive blackjack betting systems. His tests were limited to the first 20 shoes (968 bets) of his 5,000 hand run and did not incorporate using Quit Points.

Although his progressive blackjack betting system fared slightly better than either Dahl’s or Patrick’s systems, the validity of the comparisons was diminished somewhat by only using 968 bets and by not including Thomason’s recommended Quit Point in testing his blackjack betting system. John Patrick specifically recommends that a player leave the table if he loses the first four hands in a shoe or deck.

While Thomason’s tests are thought provoking, they do not address the issue of how well a negative progression might have fared played against the same hands, using a predetermined stopping point for consecutive losing hands.

I devoted several pages to Thomason’s work because it is unique among blackjack books. Most experts who advocate card counting have closed minds when it comes to believing that any approach other than card counting has any validity for winning at blackjack.

They typically use computer simulations, which are incapable of judging the effects of consecutive winning or losing hands or of additional blackjack betting system rules as may be used by human beings playing in real world conditions.

As a result, the card-counting advocates invariably come up with simulated results showing that flat betting, using progressions, lose at the rate of the house edge multiplied by the amount wagered, and that card counting provides the only source of a winning strategy.

 Of course, this reasoning also shows that card counting is the only blackjack betting system capable of beating the game. At this point in the book, I hope you are more than a little skeptical of the claims of card counters.

Hang on to your hat. I am about to show you how you can back the casinos into a corner using the Nine-Count Blackjack Strategy Betting System.